Eyewitnesses to a massacre at an Islamic school say it was carried out by Buddhists, and many contend it stems from a coordinated effort with ties to the top 14 Apr 2013
Mon Hnin, a 29-year-old Muslim woman from Meiktila,
in central Myanmar, spent the night of March 20 with her daughter and
mother-in-law hiding in terror in the bushes on the fringes of her
neighbourhood.

KILLING FIELDS: Right, the madrasa where more than 40 Muslims were killed on March 21.
A wave of murderous anti-Muslim riots led
by Buddhist extremists had exploded earlier that day in the dusty town
with a population of 100,000 people, located 130km north of the capital,
Nay Pyi Taw. Like the houses of many other Muslims in the town, the one
belonging
to Mon Hnin, whose name has been changed for security
reasons, had been destroyed by a Buddhist mob in the Mingalar Zay Yone
quarter and she and her relatives had to take refuge in the first place
they could find.
The next day, she witnessed something far
worse than the destruction of her property, as she told Spectrum at a
non-governmental refugee camp near Meitktila where she now lives with
about 3,400 other Muslim refugees. The bushes where Mon Hnin, her
daughter and her mother-in law had hidden the previous night are not far
from a local madrasa _ an Islamic school _ where one of the worst
episodes of the violence took place. According to several eyewitnesses,
that morning a Buddhist mob attacked the school killing at least 30
students and four teachers.
Mon Hnin said she saw about 30 policemen
arriving in trucks about 8am. From her vantage point, she saw how the
students and teachers of the madrasa gave up to police the weapons they
had improvised to defend themselves. She claimed that a group of them
was offered the chance to be evacuated from the area in police trucks,
but they were attacked by the mob before reaching the vehicles.
One of those she saw being killed was her
husband, a halal butcher who was stabbed to death. The policemen in the
area did nothing to stop the carnage. Shortly afterwards, Mon Hnin, her
daughter and mother-in-law were given shelter in the house of a
Buddhist neighbour.
From March 20-22, this dusty garrison
city was engulfed by the worst communal violence in Myanmar since the
anti-Muslim pogroms that took place in Rakhine state in June and October of last year.
The trigger of the violence was a brawl
between the Muslim owners of a gold shop and two Buddhists who tried to
sell a gold hair clip on the morning of March 20. Several different, and
often contradictory, accounts have emerged of the incident, but there
is no doubt that a Buddhist mob responded by hurling stones at the shop
and ended up wrecking the building.
That evening the riots became deadly when
about 5.30pm a monk was attacked by four Muslim men who torched him
alive. The monk died in hospital that same evening. Just a few hours
later the city was on fire when groups of Buddhists unleashed their fury
on Muslims and their properties under the gaze of security forces, who
for two days watched the violence without taking any action.
Many witnesses have confirmed the failure of the police to prevent the violence. One of them is Win Htein, the local MP of the National League for Democracy
(NLD), the party of Aung San Suu Kyi. Win Htein, a former army officer
who spent 20 years in jail for his political activities and used to
organise security for ”the Lady” after her release from house arrest on
November 2010, told Spectrum in the ramshackle local NLD office that he
witnessed the carnage in front of the madrasa.
”I saw with my own eyes two people already dead and five more put to death in front of me.”
He said he tried to protect the Muslims, but was threatened by the mob. Then he called the chief minister of Mandalay Division,
Gen Ye Myint, and told him what was happening. ”He said he’d already
given orders to the police to take action, but there was no action at
all,” Win Htein said.
It took a further day before the army
stepped in and restored some order in the city. By then, at least 42
people had been killed and more than 60 were injured. Those are the
official estimates, but the real figures are likely to be considerably
higher, considering that at least 30 people died in a single incident at
the madrasa.

One local reporter who witnessed the
carnage, told Spectrum that she arrived at the scene at 5pm and saw a
pile of several dozen corpses just metres from the madrasa. When she
went back four hours later, the pile had been set on fire.
On March 21, the young reporter saw and
filmed a group of Buddhists slit the throat of a Muslim man, before
dousing him with petrol and setting him on fire. She continued recording
despite being told to stop, but eventually had to flee the scene when
six or seven Buddhist men chased her, hitting her on the back.
The reporter said that during the time
she was in Meiktila, from March 20-22, she saw only Buddhists carrying
weapons and the violence was fundamentally one-sided, with the Muslims
always on the receiving end.
Win Htein said the attacks were
spontaneous and perpetrated by Buddhist residents of the city, but
others witnesses claimed the attackers were unknown to them and seemed
to be following a well coordinated plan.
Three weeks after the riots, the Muslim
quarters of Meiktila are large wastelands of destroyed buildings and
charred cars, resembling the aftermath of a war or natural disaster, and
where the poorest inhabitants of the city scavenge for scrap to sell.
More than 18,000 residents, most of them Muslims, have been displaced by
the violence and most of them are now living in government-controlled
camps. The camps are off-limits to journalists, but there are also
unofficial camps like the one where Mon Hnin lives.
The government has announced plans to
rebuild the destroyed houses within two months, but few believe in its
ability or even its willingness to do so. Many Muslim refugees fear
their situation might become permanent, as happened to the Muslim
Rohingya in Rakhine state, in western Myanmar. Unlike the Rohingya,
however, the Muslims of central Myanmar are officially recognised as
citizens of the country.
THE VIOLENCE SPREADS
After Meiktila, the anti-Muslim attacks
spread to other parts of central Myanmar, getting dangerously close to
the the nation’s largest city, Yangon. In the Bago region, the pattern of violence against Muslim people and property was repeated in no less than 14 villages.
More than 80 refugees from Minhla, a town
with a population of about 100,000, are now living in a mosque in
Yangon after fleeing a wave of attacks on March 27.
Ko Maung Win (not his real name), a
teacher at the local mosque recounted how a mob of Buddhist extremists
attacked the mosque shortly after afternoon prayer. Nobody was killed or
injured during the attacks.

He and other refugees from Minhla told
Spectrum that the attacks came out of the blue, without any prior threat
or warning. They said, however, that relations between the two
communities had steadily soured after a monk visited the city at the end
of February and gave a speech telling Buddhists to shun Muslim people
and their shops. A woman who owned a grocery store in the market, and is
now one of the refugees in the mosque, said she lost many Buddhist
customers after the speech. Nevertheless, when the attacks started she
was given refuge in the home of a Buddhist neighbour.
The violence has not yet reached Yangon,
but in some of its Muslim neighbourhoods there is an almost palpable
tension, particularly at night. Since the attacks in Meiktila, the
residents of Mingalar Taungyungnunt, the main Muslim quarter of the
former capital, have set up barricades and conduct nightly street
patrols.
Muslim communities are abuzz with
rumours, especially after the fire in an Islamic school in Yangon that
claimed the lives of 13 children in the early hours of April 2. Few
people believe the official line that the fire was accidental. The haste
of the authorities to say it was, and their inability to find any
eyewitness accounts further contributed to people’s suspicions.
Neighbours interviewed recently in the
quarter said that, under the cloak of dark, people roam the streets in
cars shouting threats and insults. Many of them are afraid that during
the annual Songkran-like water festival there might be an attack similar
to those in Meiktila and Bago. Many men sleep only a few hours a night,
as they have to work at day and patrol the streets in the evening.
Every entrance to the neighbourhood from the main streets is blocked
with makeshift barricades manned by local men.
All of the men interviewed by Spectrum
were keen to emphasise that their relations with an overwhelming
majority of Buddhists have always been and continue to be peaceful and
friendly. They put the blame on ill-defined groups of ”Buddhist
terrorists”.
Like many other Muslims around the
country, the residents of Mingalar Taungyungnunt feel unprotected and
abandoned by local authorities and the central government. During two
visits to the quarter at night, only a minimal police force could be
seen on the streets.
”We don’t know who these people are, but
we are not afraid. If they attack us, we will fight back,” said a young
man in one of the barricades.
The anti-Muslim sentiment finds its
expression in a campaign called 969, which encourages Buddhists to shop
only in Buddhist outlets and calls for a defence of Buddhism in Myanmar
against the supposed threat of a Islamisation. The campaign is named
after the ”three jewels” of Buddhism _ the nine attributes of Buddha,
the six attributes of his teachings, and the nine attributes of the
Sangha. There are many 969 stickers in shops, taxis and cars around
Yangon and other cities.
The most visible face of the 969 movement
is Ashin Wirathu, a monk from Mandalay who is famous for his
anti-Muslim speeches. The boyish-looking 45 year old with a calm
demeanour and soft voice was jailed in 2003 for inciting anti-Muslim
riots and released under an amnesty in 2012. Spectrum met him in
Masoeyein, a monastery in Mandalay whose monks are famous for their
political activism.
Sitting beneath several huge portraits of
himself, Ashin Wirathu explained the ”Muslim conspiracy” which,
according to him, threatens to engulf Myanmar.
A man full of contradictions he seems
consistent only in his criticism of and dislike for Islam. He denied at
first that he mentions Muslims in his speeches at all, but later
admitted that he does speak about them, but only because he wants to
inform people of the reality.
At one point he even claimed that 100% of
rapes in Myanmar are committed by Muslims, disregarding the fact that
the army is known to use rape as a weapon in its wars against ethnic
insurgents.
He traced his anti-Muslim activism to
1996, when a Muslim who had converted to Buddhism gave him a supposed
”secret message” circulated among Myanmar Muslims laying out their
conspiracy to Islamise the country. The message included a plan to marry
Buddhist women in order to convert them, and taking over the economy.
Ashin Wirathu also warned that if Myanmar Buddhists do not take action,
by 2100 the whole country will resemble the Mayu region of Rakhine
state, an area mostly populated by Muslim Rohingya.

Ashin Wirathu recognised that Buddhists
have committed acts of violence, but refused to admit that his
incendiary speeches have anything to do with them. He also refused to
acknowledge that his discourses incite hatred towards Muslims, stating
that he is just ”informing the public”.
He even claimed that, should people
listen to him, no Buddhist would engage in violence, despite the fact
that he gave one of his trademark speeches in Meiktila just four months
before the recent violence. Eventually, as a solution to the ”Muslim
problem”, he presented a simple formula: ”Buddhists can talk with
Muslims, but not marry them; there can be friendship between them, but
not trade.”
Ashin Wirathu’s words enjoy widespread
publicity in the country and he is well supported by the Buddhist
community, which reveres monks as the ultimate depositaries of wisdom.
According to Win Htein, the NLD MP from Meiktila, Ashin Wirathu’s
speeches are shown in the buses operated by companies owned by the
military.
In a house in Meiktila, Aye Aye Aung, a
43-year-old Buddhist woman who owns three shops in the town, showed
Spectrum a DVD of one of Ashin Wirathu’s speeches in which he warns
against the Muslim conspiracy. She also showed us the weapon, a knife
tied to a long iron bar, that her husband made the day the violence
started to defend his family and property against possible Muslim
attackers. She said that she was willing to let Muslims live in
Meiktila, but they should be completely segregated from the rest of the
population.
Ashin Wirathu claimed that 969 is a
grass-roots movement without funding from powerful or wealthy people.
Its publicity stickers are printed and distributed by ordinary people
who act out of concern for their country, he said.
Despite his claims, several vendors at
Mandalay market said the stickers are distributed by monks from Ashin
Wirathu’s monastery.
Ashin Gambira, a former monk and leader
of the 2007 ”Saffron Revolution” is one of Ashin Wirathu’s main critics.
He said the monk is breaking the Buddhist precept of ”right speech”,
which exhorts followers in part to avoid saying anything that could
prove harmful to others. According to him, anti-Muslim sentiment was
actively promoted by the army during its five decades of dictatorship
and the hatred is now ”instilled in the minds of the people” to such a
degree that it would not take much of an effort to ”revive it at any
moment”.
It is a mystery who is behind the
campaign and Ashin Wirathu, but many believe they enjoy the financial
support of powerful people. There are also claims that they are
following the plans of hard-line elements in the military who are
unwilling to renounce their power and are posed to create unrest to
reassert their position. The fact is that the authorities have allowed
him to go around the country preaching his hatred at a particularly
delicate time.
Ashin Pum Na Wontha is a 56-year-old
Buddhist monk with a long history of political activism dating back to
1988. He now belongs to the Peace Cultivation Network, an organisation
established to promote understanding between different faiths and
communities.
In a recent interview conducted at his
monastery in Yangon, he told Spectrum that Ashin Wirathu is a merely a
puppet ”motivated by his vanity and thirst for fame”.
”Wirathu and the 969 movement receive
financial support from the cronies,” he said, referring to a group of
about 30 rich men linked to the military and the government who control
the nation’s economy. Several Muslim businessmen have huge assets and,
according to Ashin Pum Na Wontha, the cronies would like to get their
hands on them.
He said he also believes the military is
involved in the violence, as a way to destabilise the country and have
the chance to present itself as the sole institution capable of
re-establishing the law and order. According to his analysis, the
military does not want to recover full power, as it had following the
1962 coup of Gen Ne Win, but to ”go back to 1958”.
In that year, Ne Win took power
temporarily from U Nu, the first prime minister of Myanmar, and
established a caretaker government that lasted 18 months. At that time,
the army was able to present itself as the defender of democracy and
stability in the country.
Inter-religious and communal tensions had
long existed in Myanmar before Gen Ne Win took full power in 1962.
Anti-Indian and anti-Muslim riots exploded in Yangon in 1930 and 1938
due to the resentment of the Myanmar people towards Indians who had
entered the country with the arrival of the British colonisers. As
today, the riots were often incited by Buddhist nationalist monks.
Ne Win and the military junta that
replaced him played this religious ultra-nationalist and racist card for
the entirety of their rules. Muslims and other non-Buddhists were
barred from the upper echelons of the army and, almost immediately after
Ne Win’s coup, he expelled hundreds of thousands of Indians from the
country.
He also fostered a sense of a Myanmar
identity strongly linked to ethnicity and religion, which has been the
breeding ground for waves of anti-Muslim violence, like this most recent
one, which threatens to spiral out of control and spread to large parts
of the country.



No comments:
Post a Comment